Colleagues in Care 2011 Fall Edition

Children with public health insurance less likely to receive comprehensive primary care

U-M researchers find significant disparities between children with public and private health insurance

Zickafoose

Joseph S. Zickafoose, M.D.,
clinical lecturer in pediatrics and
communicable diseases

While it's generally known that children with private health insurance have historically faced challenges in accessing primary care, a new study shows just how significantly these children differ from their privately-insured peers.

According to new University of Michigan research, children with public insurance are 22 percent less likely to receive comprehensive primary care than those with private insurance.

Public insurance programs cover one-third of U.S. children, many of whom belong to the most vulnerable groups, including minorities, the underprivileged and those in poor health.

The study, published in Academic Pediatrics, determined how often children with public health insurance reported having a 'medical home,' a model for pediatric primary care designed to facilitate partnerships between patients, parents and care providers.

Researchers analyzed data from the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health phone survey of households with children ages 0-17. To determine whether they were getting medical home services, the survey asked parents about their child's usual source of care, familiarity with a personal doctor or nurse, difficulty in obtaining referrals, access to family-centered care and communication between care providers.

Only 45 percent of children with public insurance met all five of these components, far less than the 67 percent of children with private insurance.

"Because of their vulnerabilities, children with public insurance are a prime target for efforts to promote the medical home," says Joseph S. Zickafoose, M.D., clinical lecturer in Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases at the U-M Medical School. "However, until now, we knew very little about how often children with public insurance received care consistent with a medical home."

The biggest differences between children with public and private insurance were found in family-centered care, with significantly fewer parents of publicly-insured children reporting that their child's provider spent enough time, listened carefully, displayed sensitivity towards family values and customs, and provided needed information.

However, over 90 percent of children with public insurance reported having a usual source of medical care and a personal doctor. Given that this group has historically faced challenges in accessing and maintaining primary care, the researchers say this was very encouraging.

"Primary care is the cornerstone of health care for children. These results suggest that efforts to improve access to primary care for children with public insurance have been very successful," says Zickafoose, lead author of the study. This study is the first to find such associations between a composite measure of the medical home and type of insurance in a broad crosssection of children. The findings provide a national benchmark for state programs promoting the medical home concept for publicly-and privately-insured children.

"While we need to continue to assure adequate access to primary care for publicly-insured children, we also need to pay attention to the care they receive once they're in the door," says Zickafoose, "articularly for family-centered care, we have a long way to go."

FOR MORE INFORMATION
Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit (CHEAR)